I’ve tended to disagree with a host of your articles in the past. However, this article is absolutely spot on!

The only thing I can probably argue differently is the above sub-paragraph.

In the bedroom, women’s responses have traditionally been used by men, and some women, as a yardstick of the man’s prowess in that department. The kind of mythical response to a virile man who is so amazing in bed that the woman he’s with loses all control of herself, screaming and then collapsing and passing out, fainted limp and lifeless. It’s akin to Trump and his “locker room” talk.

Yeah man, I grabbed her p^*%@# so hard she squirted!

The idea of a squirting response is exactly that sort of rubbish. Women who have been conditioned into that way of thinking and with the natural need to want to pleasure a partner, which is present in any/both partners, it results in a feeling of deficiency or shame when that person discovers such a truth. It shakes them to the core sometimes. Some even turn that truth inwards and start thinking they haven’t actually been that good a partner.

The one thing it definitely isn’t, is a reminder of a male orgasm. Not sure there is any evidence of that at all.

We cant forget that sex is exercise and due to the body’s breakdown and filtration of creatinine during exercise, which happens if folk go to the gym, that’s likely why they’re seeing a larger concentration of it in the post-coital urine. Totally natural process. It’s still pee and it’s 100% pee. Pee isn’t a chemical term. It’s a compound of varying levels of various molecules. It’s why it’s different colours, precisely as you say.

All that being said, the rest of your article is absolutely bang on the money. The facts are the objective reality, whatever folk choose to believe or close their eyes and ears to. If a tree falls in the woods and one isn’t listening to it, then it crushes you if it falls your way. That’s the reality. Pure and simple.